5 key questions regarding the Covid vaccine

Does it work?

The medical definition of a vaccine is to be immunised i.e. to stimulate the immune system against the microbe, thereby preventing disease.

However, the manufacturers have already said it will not prevent you from getting the virus or even transmitting it.

They claim it’s up to 95% effective, but they do not specify what this actually means. An associate editor of the British Medical Journal Dr Peter Doshi has questioned the effectiveness highlighting how flawed the data is; 

First, a relative risk reduction is being reported, not absolute risk reduction, which appears to be less than 1%. Second, these results refer to the trials’ primary endpoint of covid-19 of essentially any severity, and importantly not the vaccine’s ability to save lives, nor the ability to prevent infection, nor the efficacy in important subgroups (e.g. frail elderly). Those still remain unknown. Third, these results reflect a time point relatively soon after vaccination, and we know nothing about vaccine performance at 3, 6, or 12 months, so cannot compare these efficacy numbers against other vaccines like influenza vaccines (which are judged over a season). Fourth, children, adolescents, and immunocompromised individuals were largely excluded from the trials, so we still lack any data on these important populations – Dr Peter Doshi

So we really don’t know whether or not it works. This evidence clearly suggests that it doesn’t stop you getting the virus and doesn’t stop you transmitting it. 

Therefore, what is the point in getting it? And why are they so desperately wanting us all to get it?

Is it safe?

Vaccines usually take 10-15 years to develop. They have admitted they have skipped the usual protocol of animal testing to check its safety.

There aren’t any studies on the long term side effects.

Further, the vaccine is based on new technology – an mRNA vaccine, which injects viral genetic material to generate an immune response. The technology has been in development for years, but this would be the first mRNA vaccine actually put to use in humans.

Despite the endless propaganda to claim its absolute safety, the vaccine manufacturers clearly have doubts, because the UK government has exempted them from any liability and legal action as a result of any problems with the vaccine. They also refuse to publicly explain why they want legal protection.

So we now live in a world where if a product that injures you, no matter how negligent the company was, no matter how incompetent the protocols, no matter how dangerous the ingredients, no matter how bad your injury is, you cannot sue that company.

The Medicine and Healthcare regulatory agency (MHRA) are telling us that it’s safe, that public safety is their number one concern. Yet they have urgently procured an artificial intelligence software tool to process the expected high volume of adverse drug reactions to the vaccine.

So just like a good politician, their actions betray their words.

What is most troubling is the deaths starting to be reported for people after taking the vaccine. A Florida doctor has died just a few days after taking the vaccine and a scientist says it’s a medical certainty he died because of the vaccine. This is being investigated further by the Florida health department and centre for disease control. 

Also, 23 elderly have died in Norway shortly after taking the vaccine and Chinese health experts are calling to suspend it.

I can’t find any data from the UK government regarding any deaths or adverse reactions from the vaccine as yet. Transparency appears to have been thrown down the plug hole in the last year.

But maybe this is the reason why they need legal protection against being sued?

Are there any conflicts of interest?

Pfizer paid out the largest healthcare fraud settlement in history for injuring thousands of people who took their drugs. They are not to be trusted.

Yet our government thinks that it’s ok to grant them legal protection against being sued?   

Maybe it’s because the Government’s chief scientific advisor has £600,000 of shares in vaccine manufacturers. It’s likely many other politicians do as well.

Another recent article published in the BMJ by journalist Paul D. Thacker highlights the conflicts of interest that exist between the UK government advisors, which also seems to be a common theme around the globe.

Kamran Abbas, a doctor, executive editor of the BMJ published an article about COVID-19, the suppression of science and that medicine is more about politics than science now. As he states;

The UK’s pandemic response relies too heavily on scientists and other government appointees with worrying competing interests, including shareholdings in companies that manufacture covid-19 diagnostic tests, treatments, and vaccines. Government appointees are able to ignore or cherry pick science—another form of misuse—and indulge in anti-competitive practices that favour their own products and those of friends and associates. – Dr Kamran Abbas

So it’s quite clear that those promoting the vaccine do not have our best interests at heart. Quite the contrary, as they appear to be profiting from using us as guinea pigs with an untested vaccine.

Hence, why should we place our health (and lives) in their hands by taking this vaccine?

Do we really need a vaccine?

Do we really all need a vaccine to protect us from this virus? A virus where most people don’t even know they have it?

As Dr Mike Yeadon says;

There is absolutely no need for vaccines to extinguish the pandemic… You do not vaccinate people who aren’t at risk from a disease. You also don’t set about planning to vaccinate millions of fit and healthy people with a vaccine that hasn’t been extensively tested on human subjects – Dr. Mike Yeadon PhD

The best way to protect yourself from a virus is lifestyle habits such as fresh air, movement and exercise, a variety of whole foods and de-stressing such as by turning off the propaganda of fear on the TV and reading a good book instead.

But of course, you can’t make money by promoting those. You can’t control the population promoting those.

It’s important to know that the human body is actually very resilient.

It has managed to adapt to deal with the toxic environment we’ve created due to the destruction of nature by humankind.

The human immune system is incredibly good at protecting us from disease.

Will it be mandatory?

The government has already done their homework on this well in advance of a vaccination being available. They have written evidence to support that mandatory vaccines would be defensible on a human rights basis. This is already the case with mental health patients who are deemed a danger to themselves and/or society. As ridiculous as it sounds, it could feasibly be argued that those who don’t get the vaccination are a danger to themselves and society.

Even though (as highlighted earlier) they have already stated the vaccine does not stop you getting or transmitting the virus!

Evidence of mandatory vaccines is starting to appear with some already stating you will need it for employment forcing a ‘no jab, no job’ policy on employees.

Though it will probably never be literally mandatory, they will certainly make it much easier to function should you get the vaccine. And virtually impossible to function if you don’t get it.

So it will likely be mandatory in all but name. 

Take responsibility for your own health

To sum up, the new Covid vaccines aren’t really vaccines because they don’t stop you getting the virus or transmitting it. They will make billions for the big pharmaceutical companies and politicians with shareholdings in them. They may make you very ill due to an adverse reaction with an evidently more worrying real possibility of death. Plus it’s likely they will become mandatory in all but name to be able to function in society.

Of course, all this evidence is ignored in the mainstream media. Instead, they promote how great it is and how totally safe it is… but it’s beyond irresponsible to claim something that’s skipped animal trials, any long term studies and needs the law changing to make the manufacturers exempt from legal action is ‘totally safe’. They are blatantly lying to you. But it’s done in such a clever way to almost psychologically hypnotise you to believe whatever they say. It is very devious.

As a health coach who is conscious and awake to what is really going on, I have a duty of care to highlight this. The need for informed consent in order to make your own decision is critical. Yet it is quite clear you won’t get informed by the government or by watching the likes of BBC news and other mainstream media. If they informed you of the truth it would blow their narrative over Covid (which is based on deception) out of the water.

It’s also worrying that all the aforementioned information is out there in the public domain. Yet many people seem so eager to believe what they are told and do as they are told without question. 

But only one person can take responsibility for your health and your life, and that is you.

Write a comment